“Dichotomy”

A monster and a soul mate.

Monsters are devoid of souls. Feelings. Love.

How can one then say that their soulmate is a monster and such as vice vera? How can one claim such emotional definition and exhibit the opposite in very stark, cemented verbal stances?

If one says actions matter more than words and yet show both in multiple situations, is this not dichotomy in and of itself? Or, does one make rules based on ones own ideals?

Is not speech an action?

No. Alas this treasonous non-corrolation has become the standard to disrupt and disarm. Talks of “love” after bouts of verbal descimation, knowing the recipient is more affluent to vocal exchange, can and will confuse said subject. Knowing the weakness and exploiting it will indeed make an enemy of one who was known as “loved”.

Psychological warfare at its finest.

Exercises in mental tribulation, of will lead to the onset of several post effects...IE: depression, anxiety, fear, defense, and several (and equally devastating) physical calamities and failures, of which will then lead to perpetuated sabotage in areas the perpetrator was ready to use to demean and deprecate in the aftermath of the response of the subject.

This is premeditated trauma. Criminal activity.

One can conclude that this is due to previous misdoings or knowledge of injustices from, or due to, traumas experienced and then projected onto a surrogate for those who were either not brought to justice or seen as unjust.

Psychological warfare and emotional abuse used a weapon on those who they propose would also perpetrate the same or worse, based on previous encounters and or experiences.

Now, exacting revenge or equalized abuse is a sign of mental deficiency and or lack of self worth, due to prior trauma which wasn’t exacted by said subject. This is a tool used by one who hasn’t seen absolution. Equally so, it is deemed as a use of unequivocal dominance in the tone or meaning of correcting wrong doing by appropriating ones own, self serving use of knowledge in order to level ones own playing field.

This is one of many rules of warfare as written or so much so explained by Sun Tsu. The art of war is a rule book...not a cheat code.

Demeaning an already broken person is a qualm best judged by gods and saints. Alas all humans are gods in their own rite and saints are allowed sanction by such, thus open to interpretation and equally unjustified. Thus gods and saints are in fact fabrications.

The opposing...well...they’re transcendent of such fabrications, rules, justifications & designations of such lower life forms.

If you create a demon, as opposed to a god, then you yourself have given way to the plight of downfall. Yours and those whom you deem worthy of such things. This is a view askew or none at all.

So, in closing, if you move forward to take away your soulmate...you and you alone are to blame. If said soulmate were worth the worthiness of such a title would they not be such as is or ever more?

Nay.

When one hammers the nails into the coffin of the dead, one must not fear and shriek in the wake of the risen dead that they entomb, fore it was the gravedigger that cursed the dead and resurrected them posthumously.